RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04732
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report (OPR) (Lt thru
Col) rendered for the period 3 Aug 10 thru 2 Aug 11 be amended to
reflect meets standards.
2. His 2 Sep 11, Fitness Assessment (FA) be accepted for this
reporting period.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He did not have a current FA test for the OPR closing out 2 Aug
11. However, there were several mitigating circumstances which
prohibited him from being current. Specifically, he was told by
his counsel at the time not to address the political conditions
that surrounded the fight between the local MPF and his unit at
the time. This was due to his counsel wishing to keep to facts and
leave the surrounding politics out of any documentation. This was
the primary cause as to why his Sep 2011 PT Test (97/100 points
scored) was not considered by the MPF at the 103 AOG unit
commander's discretion. Personal hardship, while a large part of
the circumstances surrounding why this happened, was the secondary
cause for the occurrence of the referral OPR.
He believes he has been caught in a guard-ism regarding his
location, personal situation, civilian job and unit politics.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF
Forms 707, memorandums, email communique, FA score sheet and
various other documents associated with his appeal.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 Aug 08, the applicant was appointed a captain in the
Connecticut ANG (CTANG). On 13 Apr 12, he was discharged from
CTANG having served 3 years, 8 months and 11 days of total
service.
On 14 Apr 12, the applicant was transferred to the Georgia ANG
where is he currently serving.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states there is no evidence to
support the applicants claim. AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted
Evaluation Systems states Does Not Meet Standards is defined as
having less than a passing FA score or noncurrent as defined in
accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program. A score of less
than passing or an expired FA test without a valid exemption
requires an evaluation to be referred. Evaluators must comment in
section IV (OPR) on a ratee who does not meet standards.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the applicant
on 10 Jan 14, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, the applicant has not provided any
evidence that would persuade us that his 2 Sep 11 FA should be
used as a basis to amend his OPR to reflect meets standards.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale
expressed as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2013-04732 in Executive Session on 7 Aug 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 3 Aug 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 13 Dec 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.
2
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468
Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commanders invalidation, AF Form 422, etc. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00787 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 11 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from her records. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00787 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 11 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from her records. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00258
In support of his request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and copies of excerpts from his military personnel record, which include performance reports, Air Force Forms (AF) IMT 2096, Classification/On-the-Job Training Action, as well as letters of support from his current rating chain. The complete ARPC/DPB evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In support of his request the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833
After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04760
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 22 Jun 10 through 18 Nov 10, be removed from his records and replaced with an existing Letter of Evaluation (LOE) for the same period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01883
She states that the MTF failed to initiate an AF Form 469 in a timely manner, and that she was not placed on a FA exemption until Nov 10. SAF/IG also states that Because these abnormal X-ray results were not communicated to her until Oct 10, almost a year later, she dutifully continued to comply with the muscular plan of care treatments that resulted in an Air Force FA failure for pushups, even with continuing symptoms. In fact, the applicant achieved a perfect score of 10/10 points on...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03754
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03754 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete HQ USAF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends voiding the three contested EPRs,contingent upon the Board approving the applicants request to have his FA test results removed from his records. e. His effective date...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02279
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOE states, should the Board remove the three fitness failures from the applicants record, DPSOE recommends revoking the demotion orders and restoring the applicants rank to staff sergeant. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states at this time he does not have any additional evidence in support of his...